Turing, Searle, and Artificial Intelligence - 1260 Words

The conditions of the present scenario are as follows: a machine, Siri*, capable of passing the Turing test, is being insulted by a 10 year old boy, whose mother is questioning the appropriateness of punishing him for his behavior. We cannot answer the mothers question without speculating as to what A.M. Turing and John Searle, two 20th century philosophers whose views on artificial intelligence are starkly contrasting, would say about this predicament. Furthermore, we must provide fair and balanced consideration for both theorists’ viewpoints because, ultimately, neither side can be â€Å"correct† in this scenario. But before we compare hypothetical opinions, we must establish operant definitions for all parties involved. The characters in†¦show more content†¦The answer is no because we cannot accurately determine, from the given information, whether Siri* understands what she is saying on a deep, emotional level, one requirement for personhood that both Turi ng and Searle deem necessary (Searle; Turing). We have no method of measuring Siri*’s level of understanding outside of the Turing test, which Searle rejects as an accurate measurement of linguistic understanding. And again, he also rejects the idea that any electronic machine can possess such understanding whatsoever, so Siri*s response is essentially meaningless. Part D: Answering to Amy In response to Amy’s initial question, it would be unwise to immediately present either Turing’s or Searle’s answer as a correct response. Similarly, it would be unwise to declare a winning philosophy in this scenario, as the â€Å"correct† philosophy depends on the correct judging criteria, which we lack. Clearly, if Siri* is a person, or judged to be a person based on certain criteria, then Turing is correct in his assessment; Amy should punish her child. If Siri* is not a person, then Searle is correct, and Amy would not have significant reason for punishment. But in this scenario, no judgment criteria are explicitly being applied, nor is one school of thought clearly more appropriate than the other. Therefore, our only hope of declaring which of the two theories is correct in this scenario, thereby correctly answering Amy’s initial question, is to hypothesize judgingShow MoreRelatedCan Artificial Consciousness be Possible?868 Words   |  4 Pa gesCan artificial consciousness be possible? In other words, can a machine be conscious and have the same behavior as a human. Artificial consciousness or also can be referred as machine consciousness are machines created by humans that are programmed to have artificial intelligence in the machine’s system. This means that machines are programmed to have the intelligence as a human. However, would it be possible for humans to create a machine that is programmed to have the ability to think, feel, andRead MoreArtificial Intelligence In Chapppie722 Words   |  3 Pagesrelates to the philosophers Searle and Turing due to their similar topics of Artificial Intelligence. Searle distinguishes two types of Artificial Intelligence which is Strong Artificial Intelligence and Weak Artificial Intelligence. They are both categorized based on the objectives that the inventors and researchers are concentrated on attaining. Strong Artificial Intelligence is a computer programmed to mimic the behavior of a human would possess intelligence. Intelligence is nothing more than theRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book Searle s Chinese Room 1487 Words   |  6 PagesAndrew Lavigne Philos 1E03 Searle s Chinese Room The Turing Test is a test described by Alan Turing to define whether a robot has indistinguishable human intelligence or behaviour. John Searle attempts to disprove the theory of the Turing Test through his Chinese Room thought experiment. In this experiment, Searle proposes that a man unwittingly communicates to a native speaker through the use of a program. Searle presents the prepositions that artificial intelligence is solely syntactic and doRead MoreArtificial Intelligence And The Turing Test760 Words   |  4 Pagestechnology advances and one of the most questionable advancements is artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence isn’t necessarily new but it has expanded greatly the past few years. I will first explain what artificial intelligence is and the Turing Test. Finally, I will discuss Turing and Searle’s views about the Turing Test and who has the stronger argument. According to Merriam-Webster Dictionary, artificial intelligence (AI) is, â€Å"The capability of a machine to imitate intelligent humanRead MoreThe Chinese Room : Mental Experiment By John Searle912 Words   |  4 Pages The Chinese Room is a mental experiment, originally proposed by John Searle and popularized by Roger Penrose, which attempts to counter the validity of the Turing Test and the belief that a machine can come to think. Searle faces the analogy between mind and computer when it comes to addressing the issue of consciousness. The mind involves not only the manipulation of symbols, but also has a syntax and a semantics. Searle in his Mind, Brain and programs text, attacks this thought, and with theRead MoreDualism and Artificial Intelligence1235 Words   |  5 Pagesaccording to Turing, machines may soon be able to mimic human behavior. This raises the question; if machines can act as humans do then do machines have minds? Questions like this also challenge Descartes’ theory of the mind because if a machine is capable of possessing a mind, then physicalism must be true, and the mind is merely a result of the brain which is something tangible and can be recreated according to Turi ng. Turing, a physicalist, believed that artificial intelligence could be achievedRead MoreComputers Can Not Have Minds1490 Words   |  6 PagesAlan Turing, â€Å"father† of modern computers, created the Turing Machine in order to prove, through the use of an imitation game, that computers can think. John Searle argued that the Turing Test is simply just imitating, rather than thinking. Based on Searle’s argument against the Turing Test, I think that computers cannot have minds. Although Turing argues that computers can think, there are many arguments, such as Searle’s Chinese room argument, and defenses that I will present that support SearleRead More The Morality and Utility of Artificial Intelligence Essay4241 Words   |  17 PagesThe Morality and Utility of Artificial Intelligence Douglas R. Hofstadter, in his work Gà ¶del, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid, remarks that one may contend that Artificial Intelligence is born of a machine’s ability to perform any task that had been previously confined to the domain of humans (601). However, a few sentences later, the author explains Tessler’s â€Å"Theorem† of progress in AI: â€Å"once some mental function is programmed, people soon cease to consider it as an essential ingredientRead MoreThe Turing Test And The Theory Of Computer System1833 Words   |  8 Pagesit must have the same intelligence as a human, then right? If a machine has human intelligence, then does that mean it has a mind of its own? It is desired by many humans to know if one day the answers to all these questions could be yes. In hopes of figuring this out, a testing method was created called the Turing Test. This test was created by an English mathematician named Alan Turing in the 1940s and 1950s. Alan Turing was interested in the idea of artificial intelligence, or the theory of computersRead MoreChinese Room Scenario by John R. Searle Essay531 Words   |  3 PagesChinese Room Scenario by John R. Searle Through the use of his famous Chinese room scenario, John R. Searle tries to prove there is no way artificial intelligence can exist. This means that machines do not posses minds. The debate between those who are in favor of strong and weak artificial intelligence (AI) is directly related to the philosophy of mind. The claim of weak AI is that it is possible to run a program on a machine, which will behave as if it were a thinking thing. Believers